<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The StormMQ Company Blog</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stormmq.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stormmq.com</link>
	<description>A managed AMQP service (in the cloud or onsite)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:03:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is Telemetry a good candidate sector for Message Queuing? by Nikolay Bogdanov</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/05/25/why-is-telemetry-a-good-candidate-sector-for-message-queuing/#comment-1535</link>
		<dc:creator>Nikolay Bogdanov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=251#comment-1535</guid>
		<description>I am very interested to see activities related to AMQP and MQTT protocols. However, does someone in message queuing know something about process automation world?
The key idea in telemetry collection is that all sensors are supervised from some control room by a responsible person (dispatcher). A special SCADA software is used to collect data using variety of protocols: OPC, DNP3, Modbus to name a few. And in general, there is no need to resend telemetry data to another &quot;client&quot;. 
I am thinking how to implement MQ in process control (as I am an expert in SCADA systems), but still do not see &quot;free market&quot; for it.
Anyway, MQ and &quot;internet of things&quot; are promising areas...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am very interested to see activities related to AMQP and MQTT protocols. However, does someone in message queuing know something about process automation world?<br />
The key idea in telemetry collection is that all sensors are supervised from some control room by a responsible person (dispatcher). A special SCADA software is used to collect data using variety of protocols: OPC, DNP3, Modbus to name a few. And in general, there is no need to resend telemetry data to another &#8220;client&#8221;.<br />
I am thinking how to implement MQ in process control (as I am an expert in SCADA systems), but still do not see &#8220;free market&#8221; for it.<br />
Anyway, MQ and &#8220;internet of things&#8221; are promising areas&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why is Telemetry a good candidate sector for Message Queuing? by dieta</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/05/25/why-is-telemetry-a-good-candidate-sector-for-message-queuing/#comment-1427</link>
		<dc:creator>dieta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 13:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=251#comment-1427</guid>
		<description>Im looking for a MSMQ alternative which use SQL Server as messages persistance since MSMQ as some limitations 4Mb Message Size 1.6Go Queue Size ..Is there any open source or free project doing that ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im looking for a MSMQ alternative which use SQL Server as messages persistance since MSMQ as some limitations 4Mb Message Size 1.6Go Queue Size ..Is there any open source or free project doing that ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a C client for AMQP to fit onto an embedded device by stormmq</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2010/10/01/writing-a-c-client-for-amqp-to-fit-onto-an-embedded-device/#comment-439</link>
		<dc:creator>stormmq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=67#comment-439</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan, we have not released this specific C Client, however we have released our current (unfinished) C Client under the Apache Licence here:
http://www.libamqp.org</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan, we have not released this specific C Client, however we have released our current (unfinished) C Client under the Apache Licence here:<br />
<a href="http://www.libamqp.org" rel="nofollow">http://www.libamqp.org</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a C client for AMQP to fit onto an embedded device by The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Announcing libamqp, an open source C client for AMQP 1.0</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2010/10/01/writing-a-c-client-for-amqp-to-fit-onto-an-embedded-device/#comment-438</link>
		<dc:creator>The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Announcing libamqp, an open source C client for AMQP 1.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 May 2011 23:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=67#comment-438</guid>
		<description>[...] Eamon has written C Clients in the past for AMQP. In a previous post he wrote about how he developed a client that supports the 0.8 and 0.9.1 versions of the specification for an embedded device. libamqp is a complete departure from this work and only supports the imment 1.0 specification. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eamon has written C Clients in the past for AMQP. In a previous post he wrote about how he developed a client that supports the 0.8 and 0.9.1 versions of the specification for an embedded device. libamqp is a complete departure from this work and only supports the imment 1.0 specification. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Writing a C client for AMQP to fit onto an embedded device by Dan Cohen</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2010/10/01/writing-a-c-client-for-amqp-to-fit-onto-an-embedded-device/#comment-437</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2011 16:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=67#comment-437</guid>
		<description>6 months have passed since you said you might release the code, has it been released?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6 months have passed since you said you might release the code, has it been released?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The road to writing a new protocol is long and lonely by The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some recent questions from customers and partners</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/02/24/the-road-to-writing-a-new-protocol-specification-is-long-and-lonely/#comment-1381</link>
		<dc:creator>The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Some recent questions from customers and partners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Mar 2011 11:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=223#comment-1381</guid>
		<description>[...] group, AMQP is completely committed to interoperability&#8230;so much so that we have organised 4 connect-a-thons between the various AMQP implementers so that we can ensure that this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] group, AMQP is completely committed to interoperability&#8230;so much so that we have organised 4 connect-a-thons between the various AMQP implementers so that we can ensure that this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on AMQP 1-0 and the AMQP Connect-a-thon by The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The road to writing a new protocol is long and lonely</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2010/12/15/amqp-1-0-and-the-amqp-connect-a-thon/#comment-636</link>
		<dc:creator>The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The road to writing a new protocol is long and lonely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=149#comment-636</guid>
		<description>[...] 4 ‘connect-a-thons’ where the various teams get together for a week to thrash out our issues. The first of these connect-a-thons was in December 2010 in Redmond. RabbitMQ (VMWARE) hosted the second ‘connect-a-thon’  in February 2011 at their London [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 4 ‘connect-a-thons’ where the various teams get together for a week to thrash out our issues. The first of these connect-a-thons was in December 2010 in Redmond. RabbitMQ (VMWARE) hosted the second ‘connect-a-thon’  in February 2011 at their London [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on StormMQ join the AMQP Working Group by The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The road to writing a new protocol specification is long and lonely</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/01/05/stormmq-join-the-amqp-working-group/#comment-646</link>
		<dc:creator>The StormMQ Company Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The road to writing a new protocol specification is long and lonely</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Feb 2011 10:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=155#comment-646</guid>
		<description>[...] implementation stage is a technically complicated stage. StormMQ joined the working group at the start of this stage and we are now working with a team of implementers on code using the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] implementation stage is a technically complicated stage. StormMQ joined the working group at the start of this stage and we are now working with a team of implementers on code using the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on StormMQ and Kaazing bring the MQ to the browser by Tweets that mention The StormMQ Company Blog » Blog Archive » StormMQ and Kaazing bring the MQ to the browser -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/02/08/stormmq-and-kaazing-bring-the-mq-to-the-browser/#comment-1351</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The StormMQ Company Blog » Blog Archive » StormMQ and Kaazing bring the MQ to the browser -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Feb 2011 19:04:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=205#comment-1351</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by kaazing and Ulitzer.com, StormMQ. StormMQ said: We can now finally announce our partnership with Kaazing: http://bit.ly/ehfKL1 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by kaazing and Ulitzer.com, StormMQ. StormMQ said: We can now finally announce our partnership with Kaazing: <a href="http://bit.ly/ehfKL1" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ehfKL1</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Apples and Oranges: Security, Authenticity and Queue Permissions by Tweets that mention The StormMQ Company Blog » Blog Archive » Apples and Oranges: Security, Authenticity and Queue Permissions -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://blog.stormmq.com/2011/01/18/apples-and-oranges-security-authenticity-and-queue-permissions/#comment-1067</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention The StormMQ Company Blog » Blog Archive » Apples and Oranges: Security, Authenticity and Queue Permissions -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2011 17:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog2.stormmq.com/?p=188#comment-1067</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eamon Walshe. Eamon Walshe said: RT @stormmq: The final part of our blog series describes the differences between SQS and StormMQ in terms of security: http://bit.ly/f20JNG [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Eamon Walshe. Eamon Walshe said: RT @stormmq: The final part of our blog series describes the differences between SQS and StormMQ in terms of security: <a href="http://bit.ly/f20JNG" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/f20JNG</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

